Thursday, March 31, 2011

Traffic

Three years ago I did not know what traffic was.  We lived a couple of miles from work and made the trip in just a few minutes, regardless of road conditions.  Now we live 25 miles away and the drive to an from work takes 30 minutes on a good day, 45 minutes or much more on a bad day.  I usually don't mind the drive. 

I can enjoy the drive in to work.  It's early, the conservative talk radio has my attention, and traffic snarls are fairly rare.  The drive home is different.The first 5 miles of the trip are on a very congested section of interstate highway.  If I get an early start, I cruise right through.  Otherwise it can be an interstate parking lot.  Since I want to get home to spend time with my 53 year old woman, the going home traffic is aggravating.

There is one traffic phenomonon that I just don't understand.  I'm in the extreme left lane (fast lane) cruising at 50 mph.  All of a sudden, traffic slows to a complete stop for a few seconds, then picks up and accellerates to 50 mph again.  How can that happen? There are no left hand exit or entrance ramps.  Is there some moron a mile ahead that brake-checks everyone?  If you catch them can you perform your own special version of road rage on them?

Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Opening Day

A couple years ago I was at at KC Royals versus Detroit Tigers game that rapidly got out of hand.  I left the stadium in the seventh inning with the Royals down 18-2.  On the way home I tuned into the ballgame on the car radio.  In the eighth inning the Royals scored 4 runs making the score 18-6.  In the bottom of the ninth, the Royals play-by-play guy made a statement that stuck with me.  He opened the inning by saying, "Well, a couple hits, a couple walks, an error or two, a balk, stolen base and a couple of grand slams and we're right back in this game."  The epitome of optimism. 

Tomorrow is Opening Day in Kansas City.  I am predicting the Royals will win the World Series this year.  No one can dispute they are due.  This perennial loser has been quietly saving up their wins so they can take the World Series in 2011.  Who knows.  A couple hits, a couple walks, an error or two, a balk, stolen base and a couple of grand slams during a hundred or so games, and we're are in the thick of the pennant chase.  Do it another 11-12 games and we win the series.  Now I am the epitome of optimism.

Monday, March 28, 2011

Stupid Letter of the Week

The stupid letter of the week goes to Danny Martin of Lathrop Missouri.  Danny also gets special mention for his Blinding Flash of the Obvious.  Danny correctly connects unrest in the Middle East with U.S. involvement. 

U.S. hand in unrest



Maybe it is time to look at our American government to explain why all the turmoil is happening in the Middle East. Possibly the American government is responsible for the civil unrest and protests that have spread throughout the Middle East.


It would not be the first time the American government has covertly started unrest in the Middle East. We only need to look at Iraq and Afghanistan to see our American government’s covert operations at work.


Now President Barack Obama has taken it to a new level. He quietly approved a multimillion-dollar deal, now frozen, to provide refurbished armored troop carriers to Gadhafi’s army before the recent fighting in Libya. Today we are supplying the rebel forces with small arms and ammunition.


That is proof the American government is more concerned with control of the Middle East oil market than it is with humans suffering through a revolution.


Danny Martin
Lathrop, Missouri

You are correct Danny. The U.S. has triggered the unrest in the Middle East. And they didn't do it covertly as you have implied.  They did it by installing fledgling democracies in Iraq and Afghanistan.  Nothing covert there Danny.

Mental midget that he is, Danny also made the leap from aid attempt to Gadhafi, and current support of the Libyan rebels to America's desire to control the Middle East oil market.  If America is controlling the oil market, we are doing an extremely poor job of it.

Danny must feel that our involvement has the Libyan rebels acting like mind numbed robots willing to suffer, not for their own freedom, but to follow their American master.  Get real Danny.  The rebels are following their own desire - freedom. They are not controlled by American wishes.  America is simply facilitating what would be in both our interests - a Gadhafi-less world. 


I Like to Watch - The Music Never Stopped

I took a personal holiday last Thursday to spend the day with my bride.  I had never spent an entire day with a 53 year old woman before and that is one of the things I want to do.  I also want to spend time with a 54 ..55 ...56  etc.  year old woman and expect to get that opportunity too, someday.  We started with a brunch at a new restaurant we recently discovered, ran a few errands and went a movie.  Since I was taking a valuable vacation day, I had the honor of selecting the movie.  I picked a brand new movie playing at the local eclectic movie house titled "The Music Never Stopped". 

I had seen previews and became interested because it featured music from one of my favorite bands, The Grateful Dead.  It seems the rest of the world is just now learning about their music - something I have known for nearly 35 years.  I also found the movie had a plot - another plus when selecting a movie.  Knowing that -T would never pick the movie, I did.  She rolled her eyes and agreed to come along.  The following is an abridged version of the movie's description.

"The Music Never Stopped," based on the case study named "The Last Hippie" by a doctor who also wrote "Awakenings", which led to a movie that starred Robin Williams. The stories are very similar.  "The Music Never Stopped," tells the story of a father (Henry) and prodigal son (Gabriel) adjusting to the son's cerebral trauma.

Set in 1967, after the father  forbids him to see a Grateful Dead concert, son Gabriel runs away from home. Nearly twenty years later, Henry, a straight-laced engineer and lover of big band music, is shocked to learn that his estranged son requires major surgery to remove a suddenly discovered brain tumor.  After the operation, it is found the tumor damaged the part of his brain that facilitates the creation of new memories.

For Gabriel, past, present, and future become indistinguishable, and he lives fixed in the era of Vietnam, acid trips, and psychedelic music. Determined not to let their son slip away again, Henry and wife Helen vow to connect with Gabriel, who is barely able to communicate effectively. Unhappy with Gabriel's lack of progress, Henry does his own research on brain injuries, which leads him to Dr. Dianne Daly. She is a music therapist who has used her methods to make significant progress with victims of brain tumors.

As Diane works with Gabriel, she realizes that he is most responsive to the music of the Rock and Roll era - The Beatles, Bob Dylan, and particularly the Grateful Dead. Even though he is unaware that the era of his music has long passed, the effect is remarkable, and he begins to be able to have conversations and express himself. Although Henry loathes rock and roll, he is determined to create new memories and salvage his relationship with his son. While his own health fails, Henry begins his own pilgrimage through the bands of the sixties. As he learns the songs that animate his son's soul, he indeed begins to form an unusual but emotionally vibrant bond with the child he thought he had lost.

While -T will have a different opinion, I absolutely loved the movie.  I connected with the plot on many levels.  I related as a son, as a father, and as a brain damaged deadhead.  -T was surprised that I could stay awake.  She had a difficult time doing the same.  She asks why I hated Ordinary People so much when I liked The Music Never Stopped.  Both had a similar emotional plot, (I think because I slept through Ordinary People).  Easy.  Play Grateful Dead music as the soundtrack to any movie and I'm there.

Saturday, March 26, 2011

Earth Hour

Tonight between 8:30 and 9:30 PM, the clock tower at the campus I work at will be darkened in support of "Earth Hour".  They ask that "a little candlelight be the beacon that inspires you to get involved in a sustainable future for us all".  Symbology over substance.  Earth Hour is an invention by tree hugging, left wing liberal groups to make us either feel guilty for ignoring them, or if we participate, feel as if what we are doing something worthwhile.  The amount of energy saved by dimming or extinguishing your lights for 1 hour would result in a .2% reduction in our yearly energy usage, and that is if everyone fully participates.  Since hardly anyone will, the entire exercise is pointless.

This year, I will participate.  I plan to turn on my 5 flatscreen TV's for the entire hour.  I might even watch one.  My 50" plasma will be that beacon to inspire me.  My hope is to negate whatever energy savings is realized by the irrelevant action of turning the campus clock tower lights out for 1 hour.  Stupid meaningless stunts don't make a consequential difference. 

An I am not against energy conservation.  I just feel it is grossly idiotic to think that symbolism makes a difference or even helps.  This country needs an energy policy that contains major proportions of oil, natural gas and nuclear power, with thoughtful investments in alternative and renewable energy.  The country doesn't need stunts, we need intelligent thought leading to realistic policy.  And we really don't need green groups wagging their finger at us trying to shame us into conservation.  Join me tonight by making your electric meter spin.

Friday, March 25, 2011

Celebrate

Join me in celebrating the University of Connecticut's NCAA championship.  Premature you might say?  I don't know.  Just look at what has happened in this crazy tournament.  First, all the so called good teams in KU's bracket exited early.  Notre Dame, Georgetown, Texas A&M, Purdue, Louisville, and Vanderbult are all gone.  I suspect they did not relish the thought of being pounded by a clearly dominate KU team.  So instead of playing KU, they intentionally lost early to avoid the embarrassement.

So who remains on Connecticut's path to the national championship?  Tonight KU plays the vastly inferior team Richmond.  After that they will probably play VCU and Butler.  Not too much there.   The only real challenge remaining for Connecticut is the final against Butler.  Connecticut should be well rested by then.  I am thinking Connecticut only wins that one by 15 or 20.

Thursday, March 24, 2011

Assasinate Gaddafi?

Question: If killing one man would save the lives of ten-thousand others, should we do it?

On Tuesday, the U.K. government claimed Muammar Gaddafi is a legitimate target for assassination.  They hold the position that killing the Libyan leader would be legal if it prevented civilian deaths as laid out in a U.N. resolution.  U.S. defence secretary Robert Gates countered, saying it would be unwise to target the Libyan leader, and that killing Gaddafi was not allowed under the U.N. mandate.

I say we should.  My reasoning is that Gaddafi is the military leader of the Libyan army and thus 'fair game' just like any other enemy soldier.  Actually, Gaddafi should be considered a high value target - higher than any 'command and contol' center targeted by our Tomahawk missles.  Killing Gaddafi  would bring this civil war to a rapid conclusion and would save thousands of Libyan and possibly American, Brittish, and other lives.

The world would shed no tears if Gaddafi was killed.  His country would prosper without him, and his neighbors sleep easier.  He is one crazy scoundrel in a place of immense power, and the world would be a better place without him.  So why would Britain mention this as a possiblity and the U.S. immediately stifle it?  Could it be that political correctness has spread to the military?  Is it no longer about the outcome of a war, but how we are preceived by other countries?